|
Post by shipton on Feb 13, 2015 6:50:02 GMT
Great work with those figures, a few tracks stand out with the % differences , Goulbourn a notorious track inhabited with a number of low life creatures and the figures back it right up
|
|
|
Post by shipton on Feb 14, 2015 3:52:58 GMT
what time period does the results cover JB?
|
|
|
Post by JohnB on Feb 14, 2015 7:03:12 GMT
what time period does the results cover JB? Started collecting this on the 19/02/2013. Of course I have result records going back a lot longer than that although they are archived on different HDs, it was at the time when I was booted from the major bookies so I had to find an alternative. All in all I can't say I'm much worse off. Ironically it makes no difference now as I mainly bet tries and FFs anyway.
|
|
|
Post by shipton on Feb 14, 2015 7:06:47 GMT
you don't have the pools total for each of the tabs per track , be interesting to see the difference in the published figures to see how much fixed odds $ is being invested
|
|
|
Post by JohnB on Feb 14, 2015 14:06:59 GMT
you don't have the pools total for each of the tabs per track , be interesting to see the difference in the published figures to see how much fixed odds $ is being invested Sorry Shipton, I don't. The following is a general comment not aimed at anyone in particular. I did collect it along with a lot of other stuff like bookies and Betfair odds until about mid 2012 when it dawned on me that it was of limited value without getting winners. In other words it took up more time than it was worth. I know a few punters who do this sort of thing as a substitute for life, the process of doing the form is the important part, winning money is an optional bonus. Sure, get the best price you can but do not get carried away with fancy statistics, nothing can replace selecting winners. What's the point of getting fantastic odds on losers?
|
|